<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Censorship: Politician Education Required</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelwyres.com/2010/02/internet-censorship-politician-education-required/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelwyres.com/2010/02/internet-censorship-politician-education-required/</link>
	<description>musings of a geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Position Vacant: Communications Minister</title>
		<link>http://michaelwyres.com/2010/02/internet-censorship-politician-education-required/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Position Vacant: Communications Minister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelwyres.com/?p=425#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] Wrong &#8211; (what else did we expect?) &#8211; the &#8220;Future Reference Machine&#8221; found a quote from your department that says &#8220;the attacks were not a legitimate form of political statement. They were “totally irresponsible and potentially deny services to the Australian public”. That&#8217;s the idea. They are making a political point by bringing their plight to the attention of the Australian public &#8211; thereby making it by definition, a &#8220;political statement&#8221;. Further, imposing a mandatory internet filter upon Australian internet access is also actually &#8220;denying services to the Australian public&#8221;. FUTURE REFERENCE [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wrong &#8211; (what else did we expect?) &#8211; the &#8220;Future Reference Machine&#8221; found a quote from your department that says &#8220;the attacks were not a legitimate form of political statement. They were “totally irresponsible and potentially deny services to the Australian public”. That&#8217;s the idea. They are making a political point by bringing their plight to the attention of the Australian public &#8211; thereby making it by definition, a &#8220;political statement&#8221;. Further, imposing a mandatory internet filter upon Australian internet access is also actually &#8220;denying services to the Australian public&#8221;. FUTURE REFERENCE [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

